<![CDATA[glsingeltary Blog Posts]]> http://www.nbabasketballonline.com/glsingeltary/weblog/ <![CDATA[The year of the disappointing winner Heath Slocum wins the Barclays over Tiger Woods]]> http://www.nbabasketballonline.com/glsingeltary/weblog/8383/the-year-of-the-disappointing-winner.html http://www.nbabasketballonline.com/glsingeltary/weblog/8383/the-year-of-the-disappointing-winner.html Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:08:31 PDT After last week's Barclays, an analyst said something along the lines of "another week, another surprise winner in this year of the underdog."  What I would have said, and what he probably wanted to say, was: "another week, another random guy wins a big PGA Tour event in this year of the disappointing finish."  For the 3rd week in a row (and what seems like the millionth time this year) a little-known player won a big tournament (PGA=Yang, Wyndham=Ryan Moore, Barclays=Heath Slocum).  But does anyone really think these guys will be consistent winners?  Let's take Y.E. Yang for instance.  Yang took down Tiger at the PGA this summer.  He didn't just edge Tiger out, he beat him soundly.  Only minutes after winning the tournament Yang was already saying that he didn't want a rematch! 

Continue reading "The year of the disappointing winner Heath Slocum wins the Barclays over Tiger Woods"

]]>